So where does the Heir begin on this one?  Stuff like Michael Flynn, and premature reopenings, and that one lady whose actions threaten enforcement of compliance.  With Michael Flynn, the Heir references a video that you can search for on Youtube with the search terms "michael flynn dismissed not so fast".  It's a legal expert video, and one thing he points out that for some reason the Heir didn't see on the Insurgent News Network is the role that Emmet Sullivan's going to play.  The Insurgent Network only *briefly* mentions Judge Sullivan, but they downplay him in favor of trying to tell people that the Michael Flynn case is done already.  But as the video points out, not so fast.  The video talked about how among other things Judge Sullivan assigned a magistrate judge to the case for the apparent purpose of requesting amicus briefs.  Carmen wasn't sure what that was, so the Heir reminded her that's better known as Friend Of The Court brief, i.e., third parties.  What the Heir takes out of that is that Judge Sullivan's finding reasons to maintain justice in all senses of the word, in effectively requesting legal experts and groups to possibly make a legal case in their amicus for morality and principle at large in society.  The Heir thinks the judge wants people to come up and say that a dismissal of the Flynn case would set a bad example for others in society who, too, want to get off scot-free with felonies.  It's possible there's a criminal justice element on this one, in case a lawyer files a brief who represents someone who's served decades just for being caught with a joint, or a similarly less serious offense.  Everyone seems to think that Judge Sullivan will ultimately move to honor the dismissal request, but only the Heir thinks that may not happen.  He's thinking that Judge Sullivan will likely match unprecedented with unprecedented.  Experts agree that a motion to dismiss a case where the defendant has pleaded guilty twice is unprecedented, but that for a judge to deny dismissal would also be unprecedented.  The Heir's also sure that once a dismissal denial happens, everyone on the Insurgent Network would be like, oh wow this really blows my mind, I never thought that judge would *ever* do that!  Well, the Heir did, and he did so when it wasn't fashionable.

The Heir believes that compliance is falling apart, and enforcement will follow sooner after, and it'll be like the Wild West that Tony Sayers/Mayers lamented in Wisconsin.  Again it's about a video, and again the Heir didn't see the video since his judgement with analog audio is that the video is just news porn with no substantive implications whatsoever.  He heard on analog audio that a few days ago somewhere between 6-8 copies confronted a lady who had her mask around her chin but refused to wear it properly.  She then spat on the cops and claimed that she had the coronavirus.  This is what the Heir calls cop-spitting and/or coronassault.  He's heard it all over the compliance briefings with Bachelor Blue State, so this isn't an unusual occurrence.  The lady was then interviewed by the onlooking media saying she wants to have all charges against her dismissed, but the Heir's having none of it.  Firstly, the lady waived her right to remain silent, since what she said to the press can *and will* be held against her in a court of law.  Secondly, the way the Heir heard the report on audio sounded like all 8 cops jumped on the lady and wrestled her to the ground, but he's pretty sure this isn't what happened.  He's pretty sure it was only two cops, with one cop initially, and then the other tried to help his colleague.  He's sure the lady deliberately dropped to the ground, thereby forcing the cops to stoop down accordingly, making it look as if they forced her to the ground.  And thirdly, it's the video.  How does the Heir know this wasn't a cop-hating setup?  It feels to him like the lady had an accomplice with a phone, and she said to him/her, okay watch me instigate here, and then approached the cops without a mask on, just baiting them to take action.  This is even worse than the other case a couple weeks ago, because the cop in that case was caught sitting on the guy's back and whipping him upside the head.  This didn't happen here, so the Heir's thinking that it's yet another anti-cop move that will only serve to denigrate enforcement and compliance, and it ultimately affecting the suburbs of Bachelor Blue State, as opposed to just troubled areas in New York City.  The Heir understands that these areas exist in the city, and you have to account for them.  The Heir *also* understands that so-called ambassadors will have little to no effect in these same areas any more than the cops ever did.  Ambassadors in the Bachelor Blue Shoreline is one thing, ambassadors in troubled city areas are quite another.  People generally credit themselves for being a big of a jerkass as possible in those cases the Heir's covered thus far, so there's little hope that troubled areas of the city will be any better than the Wild West.

"The Wild Wild West.  That was a song from the late 1980s."