So the Heir's going to pull a Flaileef here, and bomb-blast the Donkeys For The People for not doing enough to stop Amy Coney Barrett from going on the Supreme Court.  One of only two things he heard out of Chuck Schumer is that one decades-to-come style talking point.  This is the one where they say Person X going on the Supreme Court would have ramifications for decades to come.  The Heir takes this as disingenuous, because *any* time Person X goes on the Court, it has ramifications for decades to come, though historically the Heir sees that more often than not, "decades" is an exaggeration.  Look at David Souter.  He was only on the Court for two decades, and the Heir isn't going to let the Chuck Schumers of the world get off the hook with saying, yeah but two decades is still decades.  That's because they know full well when you hear "decades to come," you tend to think 3, 4, 5 decades or something, to the point where you'd have an 80 year old Amy Coney Barrett still going strong in, what, I guess that would be 2050 or something?  But what if Justice Barrett also decides to leave relatively early?  That would blot out all conformist analysis.  And here's the other thing Schumer said the Heir wants to go after him for.  It was something to the effect of, you may think this will blow over, but the American people will remember.  The Heir doesn't think the Elephantine Elitists think things will blow over, since if the conventional wisdom is correct, the Elitists put Justice Barrett up there for the purpose of apparently weaponizing the Supreme Court as a kind of third house of Congress, and supposedly for "decades to come."  So that's why the Heir is asking state governments that are trying to make advances in affordable health care and affordability at large and improving people's live to get ready to defy a given decision by the Supreme Court that is perceived to be a purely political move to interfere with those advances.  The Heir also wants the remaining "liberal" Justices in their dissent in such a politicized decision to write that dissent to be actionable by the state governments, as if the dissent were the decision itself.  It's kind of a shame that it may come to that, because it means that the Supreme Court will cease to be the respected institution it is today, as opposed to a bureaucratic obstacle to be done away with like the way people seem to see the Electoral College as being.  That's why we in the Bachelor want to emphasize things like jurisprudence and respect for precedent over weaponized politicization.

"Poh Lit Tiss So Sigh Zay Shun."

We in the Bachelor encourage Cy Vance to appeal his case against Paul Manofort to the New York State Supreme Court, after being rejected at the appellate level on supposedly double jeopardy grounds.  Here's one question Mr. Vance can make before the courts: is it really double jeopardy to try Manofort again if Trump pardons Manofort at the federal level?  Here's why we think it isn't.  The appellate court made their rejection based *only* what they see on paper in the present, and didn't try to explore the case in the event of a pardon.  What they'd say for their side is that a pardon is supposedly hypothetical, while at the same time acknowledging how Trump is going to be pardoning hardened criminals.  That's the appellate court struggling with cognitive dissonance, and approaching the case from as narrow a view possible, also not accounting for the millions of dollars wrongly charged to the taxpayer as yet unrecouped.  We also see the appellate court as failing to make the case that Manofort facing the optics of double jeopardy is an unfair precedent for example for a poor young man from the inner city seeking justice, since the latter does not have anywhere near the legal resources as Manofort does.  Cy Vance has to make sure the courts don't deal him with O.J. type rulings, because that would certainly damage the country.  And it's doubtful to us that the courts would ever regret making such a ruling.  So if Manofort, and Roger Stone and Michael Flynn ever achieve their lifelong dream of a get-out-of-jail-free-card, we in the Bachelor request that BLM petitions Manofort/Stone/Flynn to have a sit-down with the families of George Floyd and Brianna Taylor so those guys can appreciate how the rest of the country can only struggle for the justice they so easily achieve.  It's just not going to be over if the court cases are over, since there will still be law-and-justice anger in the country long after the Trump era.

This Bachelor shares base is powered by Blogger, a subsidiary/subdivision of Google.  So with that one disclaimer out of the way, we observe that among other things, the lawsuit against Google was a long time coming.  Big Tech had always believed it somehow had an entitled ownership of human culture, and that everyone had to do what Big Tech told them to do.  We've observed that everyone actually did believe they owed Big Tech, and the Heir still believes that people still do believe they owe Big Tech, including the progressives, the powering of whose online funding and organizing the progressives see as almost totally depending on the dominance of Big Tech.  This lawsuit means that that dominance is coming to an end, but Big Tech is going to fight back against the rest of humanity.  They might end up driving down the capacity of their data centers so that human activity ends up slowing down and running into a crisis as a result.  Because here's the thing, and this is why we need the concept of Prepper Maker.  We as a society can throw all we can at Big Tech, but all Big Tech needs to do is whip out that one agreement that every single human being signed with their blood in the "disruptions" 2010s, and remind everyone that they agreed with Big Tech that they somehow *need* Big Tech.  It's kind of like the Matrix or Skynet that way.  Prepper Maker and the DIY Insurgency on a public commons level like with our own networks and processors would be our declaration as a species that we *do not* need Big Tech.  We don't need Big Tech to run society for us.  Big Tech needs *us* to run their businesses with.  That's why the Heir's working feverishly in the coming of tropical soul on his DIY music player, and once it's running properly, he will physically hold it up against Big Tech's physical holding up of that agreement of that Faustian deal that humanity was forced to make with them.

"Once I get that DIY player done, that will be Prepper Maker proof that we as a human species don't need Big Tech in order to survive.  And maybe then we'll see the dawning of a new era."

The Heir doesn't see the Donkeys For The People as having any kind of strategy where Amy Coney Barrett is concerned.  Again he blames the influence of Ed Snowden, and this whole Stand For Something business, which dictates among other things against any use of strategy in anything whatsoever.  The Ed Snowdens portray any show of pragmatic strategy as a form of weakness, because somehow it's supposed to mean you're an unassertive person of some sort.  Obviously it makes no sense.  But having said that, the Heir does not buy Chuck Schumer's assertion that Amy Coney Barrett means the end of Funny Named Care.  It just sounds too much of a specious argument for the Heir.  It's no wonder people are worried about the future.  They hear all sorts of doom and gloom, and big tech gets people to believe that the future can only be like the present, and not an opposite as per its wont.  So the Heir recommends that people get a grip on this one and try not to make overgeneralizations.  But he's mad about the fact that instead of him being able to get local headlines in the 9am briefing, they went to special coverage of the hearings starting with "analysis."  The Heir doesn't want no analysis, he wants his basic local headlines.  The Heir tells those people what they can do with their so-called analysis, because if anything important happened in Bachelor Blue State, like with the coronavirus and additional executive orders, he's totally in the dark about it.  Excuse me citizen, the now brutalizer-reputation-disgraced cops will tell him tomorrow morning, but haven't you heard about this one lane change here because of the coronavirus???

"No, officer, because they were covering the judicial hearings instead.  I didn't hear *any* special orders coming out of the Governor's office."

One form of systemic racism the Heir doesn't see our addressing now that we have the opportunity is the concept of professionalism.  It's a concept the Heir sees as an excuse to disinclude "undesirables" from a workplace in which they'd be effectively far more qualified and far more likely to excel in than the people who currently work there.  Sure, you need to go to school for things like law, medicine, nursing and accounting, but other than that, those job ads that say you need 10 years of experience in 20 different systems the Heir believes should not be posted in the first place.  If you need a career change, the Heir recommends that you should find a reasonable entry level type position whose only requirement is sincere interest in the job.  Let's get rid of these unnecessarily high barriers to entry who then have the gall to claim they're an equal opportunity employer.  If those people the Heir sees brutalized died for anything, it's getting rid of professionalism.

The Heir sees that one member of Antifa those cops shot to death weeks ago, and wonders if the cops in that case also should be brought to justice like in the other brutality cases.  If the progressives haven't made that demand, that there the Heir sees as general evidence that Antifa is neither "anarchist" or "far left."  The Heir sees Ed Snowden and Anonymous as being those things, not Antifa.

Even though we in the Bachelor are high on law and justice type issues, we do wish Trump and his family a speedy recovery.  That said, we've observed that a number of officials got the coronavirus while attending that public briefing with Amy Coney Barrett.  The Heir asks whether Ms. Barrett was tested herself and whether she's negative or positive.  She too was physically close to the people who went down, and who weren't wearing a mask.  So the Heir thinks it's possible that if Ms. Barrett tests positive, she may end up withdrawing her name from consideration while she's on the mend.  Only possible though.  Something the Heir has made available for the analysts to think about.  Stay tuned.