Tropical Soulvangelical isn't used to our current level of commentary this week. We put out at least four base shares in this time, and here comes the fifth one or so. TSV felt like he had to address the things we talked about in the four base shares when he wanted to talk about Jordan Neely. Now here's his chance. So he did research on the lawsuit Neely's family filed shortly after Daniel Penny was acquitted on homicide charges in 2023. TSV researched partly through A.I. that the lawsuit is still active, and that a hearing is scheduled on June 10 to create a schedule that TSV believes creates a rough outline for the process of the lawsuit in court. He originally wanted to create a concept-of-principle based declaration but he wants to let the lawsuit move forward just in case it comes to a point where such a declaration would be made unnecessary. That's what he hopes will happen, but he's got the declaration generally ready to go otherwise. It was partially the Jordan Neely case that got TSV to have to tell the judge at jury duty that he doesn't believe the system works. He was really nervous with his voice shaking, because despite his severist outlook on things like God's Court laying down judgment on people like -trump- or Britney Spears or Justin Timberlake, though Alex Murdaugh TSV figures is pretty much toast in the courts down here on Earth, he carries himself with a quiet humility mainly out of self-defense. He's not going to tell people what to do because that would, among other things, bring him into unnecessary conflicts, unless those people actually do ask him to tell them what to do, which of course never happens. That's almost TSV's nearly Buddhist question-and-answer approach to such interactions. That doesn't mean he "approves" of other people not always living by right he believes they are religiously obligated to do, even atheists or secularists, but it's just that -they- have to ask him whether what they're doing is right or wrong, and then he'll tell them. But a court environment is a very serious one indeed, so when the judge required TSV to tell him the honest truth about the fact that the system doesn't work, TSV really had no choice to tell the judge accordingly as respectfully as possible. He doesn't think that just because the human halls of justice are mostly dysfunctional that that means he can outright mock or disrepect them. He's looking for those one or two exceptions that'll prove him wrong about what he told the judge, and he hopes that the Neely suit as eventually structured by the June 10 hearing will be one of them. He does suggest to the Neely family that they don't limit their lawsuit to Daniel Penny, but also make a filing of complaints against the jurisdiction that acquitted Penny in criminal court making a civil suit necessary. The criminal case as it had proceeded TSV believes is profoundly defective and should not go unchallenged or unreviewed. If it does, that's where his concept-of-principle-as-obligated-by-God declaration may take place.