The Heir disagrees with the judge saying that the affidavit must be made public in some fashion, because the Heir believes that doing so is unprecedented and endangers national security. But he also believes both the judge and the judge's staff were intimidated both by the Trumpists and the apparently Trumpist-sympathetic press. The Heir doesn't want hear anything more about the so-called "Fourth Estate," because does that mean We The People are merely the "Fifth Estate?" The Heir wonders why a corporate conglomerate "press" has more rights than the people, and frankly the Heir doesn't care if he is very likely to be in the vast minority of any given poll that asks whether the affidavit should be effectively -breached- that answers No to said poll. This the Heir sees as yet another black eye on the press, particularly six months after they pushed an interview of an "expert" that suggested that Russia wasn't going to attack Ukraine about a week or two before Russia did so. What's next? That the same press wants to remove all the black bars in the affidavit, and reveal who's W1, W2, CW, V? The Heir's not sure whether Merrick Garland, whom the Insurgent News Network suggests has defeated Trump at every turn, ever anticipated the judge's preliminary decision, so the Heir's not sure Merrick Garland is all that bullet-proof. But the Heir wants to see a -separate- search with respect to a -separate- case unrelated to Trump or even politics at large, with a -separate- affidavit and search warrant, and see whether that -separate- judge bows to pressure to breach the affidavit in -that- search. If not, the Heir asks what's the real difference between the two investigations if they're conducted by the book the same way respecting the same level of confidentiality?