OK, people, let's talk about the Supreme Court. Again. Last time, Tropical Soulvanglical called for its abolition, and not only does he call for it again, he also wishes his difference-maker brethren on the Insurgent Network join him accordingly. But instead, he saw them trying to tell people, well because the Supreme Court wants to grant -trump- limited immunity in the January 6 case, pragmatism is bust and you -have- to support our all-or-nothing hysteria for 2024 which we also did for 2004 and 1964. Again, that's the hysteria that says, if the "right person" doesn't win, it's all over and you might as well throw in the towel. TSV taking a pragmatic approach has come back and said, no that's anti-pragmatic to say things like that. And then there's the Supreme Court hearing, and then the Network wants to tell TSV that the hearing by itself somehow means pragmatism is no longer an option, and therefore the only option that's left is the hysteria. No, TSV replies, your saying that just means you're just pro-hysteria at all costs and as such, how does TSV know that you're also not anti-pragmatic by extension? And he doesn't want to hear them go, oh we're not saying we're -necessarily- anti-pragmatic, because then he'll go, well you said it yourself that if A is not an option and if that means B is the only option, how are you -not- anti-pragmatic out of being pro-hysteria? Of course if TSV is faced up with that blonde haired me-too-male that for some reason was able to shoehorn his way on Morning Show to have argued in favor of a pro-hysteria ideology, he'll let MTM go into his word salad fit, a la Matt Gaetz, wait till he's done and say, the details are mostly unimportant, MTM, and they don't invalidate pragmatic thinking. TSV isn't going to let himself get pulled down to MTM's confused frame of mind, because he saw what happened 20 years ago when MTM had at it with Zell Miller, who then said he regretted that having a duel was illegal. TSV can deal with just desserts like MTM far better, so it's just not a good look for Morning Show to have that guy on, and subsequently Morning Show himself wasn't on that day, and TSV really would have wanted to get Show's take on it rather than MTM. In any case, no matter how completely bad and abolishable TSV proclaims the Supreme Court to be, the pragmatic method -itself- is the argument against hysterical thinking, because hysterics TSV has figured out is a good sales argument. It's not a good logic argument, but when has logic ever sold more shaving cream than hysterics do? It's about abandoning reason in favor of giving into the temptation of one's primary urges of the emotion of fear. TSV is conservative, and what he conserves is the pro-pragmatism resistance against fear, because once you give into fear, -that's- when you should throw in the towel. TSV fully expects this coming week on Morning Show not to talk about the Supreme Court again, because all that would do is for cool heads to prevail, and a big problem with the Network TSV finds is there being too many open narratives to close the loop on. He'd like Morning Show The Man to go, oh come MTM get a grip already, but because MSTM wasn't there that day, he may forget that anything ever happened.