OK people so by now you've seen the debate, except kind of for Tropical Soulvangelical who admits he kind of wussed out and just looked at the Cliff Notes summary of the debate footage. That's partly because most outlets that aren't Insurgent or the late show hosts have truly wanted for Kamala to have a "Biden" style fail at the debate, even though his understanding of Kamala told him that she was going to have -trump- for breakfast (though it was 9pm in the evening, a bit late for breakfast), and he saw her do so. Up to this point, said outlets kept on insisting that no-one knows who she is, and that she needs to define herself before -trump- defines her -for- her. The problem is, TSV truly believes said outlets, and he wants to call out three in particular, will -still- insist that nobody knows who she is despite apparently a very big set of ratings for the debate. TSV only saw a thumbnail of one video of swing voters' responses to the debate, but he's pretty sure at least one of those is going to be a plant who will say, well I still don't know anything about her! She didn't say anything about what she wants to do for the country! I have two kids in college about to try to find their first home once they graduate and Kamala hasn't explained how her economic plans will help them! And then said outlets, TSV expects, will mainline the plants without even looking at the possibility of their being plants, and then insist, well, the swing voters made clear that Kamala didn't say anything about what she wants do for the country. We heard from one swing voter who has two kids in college about to try to find their first home once they graduate express frustration over Kamala not explaining to them how her economic plans will help them. TSV firmly expects there to be plants posing as swing voters in the swing voter panels that said outlets will make no attempt to screen, and whom said outlets will quote said plant swing voters verbatim, and that said outlets will attempt to prevent the polls from meaningfully changing after the debate, and then point to the unchanged polls and say, Kamala failed to move the needle, and hence -trump- won the debate. Sure TSV saw a thumbnail/title from CNN saying "devastating" very likely meaning for -trump- but this is just the first six hours. How about the next 18 hours after that? What if even those outlets, TSV wonders, who gave the debate victory to Kamala will try to turn around and give it back to -trump- as above? So here are those three outlets that TSV wants to go after specifically, though he's not going to limit to those three: The New York Times, the Associated Press, National Public Radio. It's going to be these three outlets TSV firmly expects to spin the debate toward -trump- with their very oh so polite intellectualism, even though he claims that people in Illinois are eating dogs and cats, and everyone who tuned in heard him say that, and that was included in TSV's Cliff Notes. TSV would actually be -amazed- if any of the three outlets would even mention the dogs and cats bit. So in post-debate, TSV would be very interested in his part for the election to join with pro-principle petitioning groups to go after the outlets to make sure they don't spin towards margin-of-error polls that they insist don't move the needle. Oh, by the way, since NPR's been waging a personal war against Biden, particularly in their insistence that Russia was not going to invade Ukraine two weeks before Russia did so, TSV refers to them as National Putin Radio. So unless TSV finds those principled groups that'll hold the outlets' feet to the fire, we're all doomed, like he's been saying the past week.