Tropical Soulvanglical isn't accepting any kind of rhetoric claiming he's just Monday Morning Quarterbacking. On the contrary, he's telling it like it is. For example, it's only in the modern age that elections have to be some kind of spectator sport, and TSV distinctly remembers a country that actually went out of its way not to make its elections into spectator sports. That was before most sports were invented, and elections were actually gentleman's agreement type exercises. What TSV remembers, however rightly or wrongly, is that the concept of "running mates" wasn't a thing. Whenever two people ran for President, the person who lost was presumed to become the winner's Vice President, so that way it's a balanced ticket perceived to be as fair as possible to the people. Whether that worked in practice is another matter entirely, but suffice it to say it was a time when we tried our darndest to make it work. TSV's estimation as to when that changed was about the time of Lincoln, and that it was just before or just after that that we introduced the concept of "running mates." Fast forward several decades and we started inventing sports. Baseball, then basketball, then football. Some time after that, maybe the 60s TSV's wondering, is when we referred to elections as "horse races." The notion that elections are any kind of sport or race TSV's wondering must have been totally alien to the country's founders. It was over five years ago TSV remembers when Ari Melber asked Elizabeth Warren if she had to pick -any- running mate from the past or present, she named Teddy Roosevelt, a Republican, and that pretty much stunned Melber. Maybe now that TSV sees people like Schumer and company to be increasingly toxic as time goes on for being so anti-Biden as they still are, he doesn't see it as a "circular firing squad" like he criticized the phrasing thereof in a past base share, but more of an effort to put country over party. Hence, the more anti-Biden the rest of the country gets, the more pro-Biden TSV gets. He's digging his heels in, and he doesn't think the rest of the country gets it or appreciates what was done or trying to be done for them, particularly the young people who want to hate him (both TSV and Biden) over Israel. TSV wants to ask the country in two years time whether they still regard Biden as the bogeyman, and he thinks he's going to get an opposite answer from what he's getting now in the form of this year's election results. There could very well have been an opposite answer even in -this- election in the form of what TSV calls the Closet Kamalas. These are people TSV observes as going out of their way to go -trumptrumptrump- with all the hats and merch and truck flags, and then they get in that voting booth, and when they think no-one's looking from outside the booth curtain, they push "Kamala." When you have a district that goes 80% for -trump- and -everyone- has -trump- signs on their lawn in that district, about 20% qualifies as Closet Kamalas. So TSV warns -trumpshanders- not to party so hard right now, because TSV's Biden his time.

Some more criticisms and stalwart determination and possible to-dos coming -from- Tropical Soulvangelical -for- Tropical Soulvangelical. So first of all, why the radio silence for the past two weeks or so? At least when he's not going after Mark Cuban and George Clooney. Well, as fatalistic as most of the activists were, TSV wanted to give them the benefit of the doubt just in case they were right and he was wrong. In any case, they still had important work to do. But that phase of things being over, he sees that they failed -precisely because- of their fatalism, which is TSV's criticism here. There were also too many texts being sent, and TSV thanks his lucky stars that he still has minutes on his flip, because he doesn't go with the bourgesie-ish smartphone ideal from a big provider offering "unlimited." TSV can go into detail about phone differences being cultural differences, maybe in a yet -another- base share, but let's go after fatalism. TSV talked about in the last base share about the folly of fatalism, but he wants to drive home the point that fatalism only results in a self-fulfilling prophecy. It's happened in 2004 and it happened 20 years later, so by that standard alone nothing has changed. That thing about "don't regret not doing more" TSV sees as causing people to end up doing less because guilt is such a poor motivator to get people to do anything. On those rare occasions people are guilted into "doing more" it's only with going through the motions. Of those 90,000 volunteers Kamala had on her staff, TSV can't point to even one who only acted out of guilt. As far as he can see, they all believed in what they did and nobody had to tell them to do things. But the biggest driver of fatalism in our overly westernized culture were the texts. Those texts that said "say goodbye to Kamala emergency in Pennsylvania" were just counterproductive. TSV's sick and tired of hearing style-over-substance type phrases such as "circular firing squad" or "snatching defeat from the jaws of victory," but look at that last one. It's the texts and their fatalism and the more fatalistic activism that snatched fatalistic defeat from the jaws of sincerely stalwart victory, not those actors borne of stalwart determination and pragmatism. As far as a circular firing squad is concerned, TSV saw the first shots in that squad coming from Bob DeNiro standing outside the -trumptrial- back in the spring, and more from the antibidens in that time. Those TSV observed were -unprovoked-. Nobody made Bob DeNiro kill the -trumptrial- in its last 48 hours when they already had it in the bag, and the reasons why TSV saw DeNiro doing so were westernized-cultural. We're just too westernized to make things work in as simple a manner as possible. That's why you need to embrace Tropical Soul as your ultimate best destiny. Those who stood by Biden and still do so now like TSV were pushing back against the fatalists and antibidens because it was doing so that was for democracy, and that's hardly a "circular firing squad." Fatalism and antibiden TSV observes this year as inviting undemocracy. The other thing you need to do besides following the righteous path of tropical soul is -not invite undemocracy-. TSV's also not using Rachel Maddow's todo list, because he already has his own, tentatively. It includes protecting affordable care, reproductive choice, alliances around the world and free and fair elections in defiance of the progressive prediction of no-more-elections, and doing all of this in the most stalwart pragmatic manner possible conserving Tropical Soul and the righteous path therein.

Here comes Tropical Soulvangelical getting me the Happy Bachelor to split our base share into two separate shares with the election. Here's the first one with Allan Lichtman's Keys To The White House, and seeing how Mr. Lichtman does his YouTube live update on Thursdays, TSV's hoping he isn't trashing his own Keys and their predictability, because TSV believes that the Keys being worked properly actually -did- predict a -trump- win, but that there was wrong information and assumptions being used. TSV believes that the two keys that gave -trump- a win was social unrest and challenger charisma, and here's how. With social unrest, TSV begs with differ with Mr. Lichtman in that the anti-Israel protests weren't limited to just a few college campuses as per TSV's understanding of those protests. In fact, there's nary a college TSV knows about that -didn't- have protests, and that the protest groups did everything they could to carry their anti-Israel hatred of Biden onto Harris. Again it's about young people and Biden, whereby TSV thinks young people are mistaken about how terrible Biden is as a public figure. Mr. Lichtman didn't believe that the protests compared with the antiwar protests of the 60s, but TSV observes that they didn't have Facebook or Twitter, etc., back in the 60s, so the protests were more out and obvious then. The other key was about challenger charisma, which Mr. Lichtman also dismisses on -trump- but TSV thinks -trump- was still charimatic enough with those young swing voters that TSV believes put -trump- over the finish line, because, again, it's this thing with If Not One Then The Other that TSV thinks young voters were thinking about Biden and generalizing to Harris. They truly seemed to believe that they should go with -trump- because they hate Biden and generalizing to Harris over Israel and perceptions of the economy. The economic bit with short-term TSV wonders could be a third key in -trump's- column, because contrary to what TSV heard Mr. Lichtman say, you probably do have to factor in economic perceptions. TSV does agree with Mr. Lichtman that most of these perceptions are highly incorrect and anti-Biden biased, but TSV also believes they need to be factored in with the Keys and they weren't. More about the election in our other base share.

Tropical Soulvangelical already talked about the Keys To The White House in the other base share, but he now wants to let out on how terrible Presidential elections really are, even when his candidate wins, and how he doesn't believe they were ever truly democratic, even when his candidate wins, and it's actually not about the Electoral College. It's partly about the involvement of self important consultants such as George Clooney and Mark Cuban and Bob DeNiro whom TSV doesn't believe have any business putting their thumb on the scale in terms of them telling people what to do in activist matters, particularly with respect to that hostility towards Biden that TSV sticks it to them with, and will do so in years and decades to come. The other problem is with election year anxiety and how TSV believes that interferes with people making sound activist decisions based on sincere stalwart defiance rather than as desperate and futile attempts at things as is what TSV has observed since 2004 at least as progressive traits. He's never seen any actual -stalwart- progressive efforts in election matters, because otherwise we would be hoisting Kamala Harris on our proverbial shoulders with victory chants to boot. It confirmed TSV's donkeyish conservatism for him, and how you need to conserve stalwart defiance over letting them see you sweat, not to mention conserving National Principle that TSV also observes as progressive forces not making a priority. After all, the situation with -trump- TSV parks at the feet of the progressives from Ed Snowden onwards when they still inexplicably back in 2013 emphasized second- and third- and fourth- guessing one's national confidence just because Ed Snowden said so. Ed Snowden was the Clooney/DeNiro of his time, and TSV sees progressives as not taking Putin as seriously then as TSV did. They actually believed that Putin's Russia was part of New Europe that needed to be placed above Old Europe which they faulted as colluding with Obama on surveillance issues. In that way they were for Putin before they were against him just two and a half years ago, which TSV sees as too little too late. But TSV wants to contact the Harris Team about retaining the Great Coalition that involves those who wish to conserve things of value from across the political spectrum, because he sees the election as a mere snapshot rather than as a setting in stone of how things "have" to be for the next four years, supposedly unchangingly, and that's another cultural assumption TSV sees as erroneous with elections. We had elections in the UK, Mexico, the Philippines, Mozambique among other countries, and he's never heard of election anxiety at the same level as in the U.S., not even in Mozambique. TSV has never heard of those countries' Cloonies/DeNiros/Cubans as ever putting their thumbs on the scale like they do here. When Kier Starmer rose to prominence in the UK, TSV never heard of Brits biting their nails over whether Rishi Sunak would be overcome, or whether a British DeNiro type would ruin it for the Labour Party like ours did outside of the -trump- courthouse back in the spring. So this base share along with the Keys share is TSV outlining everything that's wrong with American Democracy, how the country's Founders should have and never prevented such and issues such as the electoral college tend to distract from real democratic problems. The electoral college TSV thinks deserves its own base share, but suffice it to say that if you -could- solve the electoral college problem, TSV doesn't see it as -truly- doing anything signficant enough to solve the other problems with, which are cultural. Stay tuned as TSV continues to dress down the country for its democratic problems for the rest of the year.

Tropical Soulvangelical's starting to get an idea of whom the culture of Tropical Soul's adversaries will be and what they'll try to do in the post-Trump era, possibly starting the first Wednesday after next month. He already has it out for Schumer and Schiff, and Bob DeNiro and George Clooney. He's adding Mark Cuban to that list, even though he knows almost nothing about him. He does know that Cuban's a Bidenhater like Clooney/Schumer/Schiff, and wants to be a powerbroker like Clooney. Other than that, he hears that Cuban's a sports executive of some sort, possibly owning the San Antonio Spurs, but for some reason has chosen to involve himself in politics and for reasons TSV suspects as being -anything else other than- public service. He hasn't ruled out Mark Cuban interviewing on/for Allan Lichtman's channel for some reason or another, but he doesn't see Mr. Lichtman wanting involvement with powerbrokers after clarifying that his Keys To The White House are about governing and not campaigning. But when he saw Mark Cuban as early as May of 2021 proclaim that Biden Is A Bad President, he already knew he was seeing Ed Snowden 2.0. He also sees the powerbrokers as dominating the agenda for Insurgent, which as of that Wednesday or so, might as well call itself Establishment, because the -real- Insurgency with TSV is him being right now the collective Biden Bros, or the Joe Bros, whichever phrase he arbitrarily thinks comes out the catchiest. This is pretty much as much as he knows right now, and as you can tell he's hardly -ever- thinking about -trump- so that's why he's not "outraged" at/about -trump- as much as the Bidenhater Powerbrokers who he sees as the collective -newtrump-. Don't get him wrong, -trump- is still the world's most immoral human being that's ever lived, but -trump- also makes a good stalking horse for those whose motives are just as questionable at best. He does not believe -for a second- that the posttrump era coming up is always going to be like the end of Return Of The Jedi with a montage of the different virtual worlds awash in celebration and pulling down -trump- statues. That bit TSV suspects is short-lived, and then the powerbrokers will start -trumping-, possibly by throwing the most faithful elements of the coalition under the bus. TSV strongly advises Liz Cheney and George Conway, for example, to watch their backs while also keeping an eye on -trump-. So it's going to be like Jedi for about 36 hours before it turns into the Jedi Purge of Revenge Of The Sith. This is what he's come to believe that powerbroking is ultimately about, and he stands ready to throw the powerbrokers under the bus even sooner than the powerbrokers stand ready to throw the coalition under the bus.

So here's Tropical Soulvangelical's regular check-in where the "Doomsday Election" is concerned. You might have rightly guessed that TSV's recently tuned into Allan Lichtman's youtube channel and a couple of interviews again, but he also wants to see what the "business bettors" on the election say too. Even when the Centrist Donkeys were in the process of kicking Biden out of the election, Insurgent itself at least showed that Biden was getting a 53% business bettor rate to -trump's- 47%. So TSV imagines that Kamala's probably getting even better, though TSV doesn't care to try to guesstimate accordingly. But he still sees the Insurgent of October 2024 essentially pulling their hair out and biting their nails, and he thinks this is for a number of reasons. Understandably you don't want people to say, oh well -I- don't need to donate or volunteer because Allan Lichtman says Harris is going to win anyway, and then take on an illusion of invulnerability. Not taking things for granted TSV sees as reasonably healthful. Where he sees Insurgent going, and even late show comics, is -not- particularly healthful. Both Insurgent and the comics he sees as relying solely on polls, even though he's also seeing the same polls come under criticism for undercounting or overcounting key groups, whichever those may be. He sees both of them as being in the same exact place TSV was before he started periodically doing Lichtman videos and election stress videos, and then being -very selective- where Insurgent is concerned. He's going to need to do that for the comics as well, so in the meantime he's coping with everyone else disregarding Lichtman's keys to the White House and the business bettors, both of which have a better track record than the polls, in favor of said unreliable polls, by doing non-election- and mostly non-political- videos like mysteries regarding disappearing people or weird space signals, or facts about science and history, as well as scifi as he sees them appearing in his lists. At the same time he's doing what he's deciding to do where the election is concerned, and he's deciding not to do more than he's planning lest that become a neurotic exercise like in 2004. Again he's looking back at 2004 as a lesson of what -not- to do. He does think that some late show comics want him to feel guilty about "not doing more, just in case," but he thinks that's really just an uncalled-for guilt trip. TSV thinks back to the many quotes and passages attributed to Ben Franklin, and he thinks that the passages are tailored toward a present day guilt trippy anxiety he doesn't think Ben Franklin ever intended. David McCullough's accounts of 1776 portrayed the -real- pitfall America faced, because the country's founders could have been hanged for what they were doing, so not even 2004 or 2016 TSV thinks even remotely resembles the account of 1776. So here's what he asks of Insurgent. Do you really think 2024 is as bad as 1776, right now in late October? Or is the only way they can answer that question is for them to say, we'll let you know when the election is over.

So here's a continuation of what Tropical Soulvangelical said through this shares base in the last base share. He wanted both me and him to go through that last share because he doesn't always like repeating the same points that he thinks should come across well enough -once.- Since that last share, TSV continues to -only- glance upon Insurgent's video titles and as of this writing they're just as fatalistic as ever, particularly regarding an NBC poll that supposedly show Harris and -trump- "neck and neck," and which was never talked about in the basic headlines TSV heard on newsradio this morning. If TSV bothered to look at those videos, he suspects that Harris may very well be still above -trump- per individual swing states by 2-3 points, and maybe 5-7 and outside the margin of error. Now that he thinks about it, he remembers Insurgent -also- reminding people that national polls don't matter as much as swing polls, and now he sees them engaging in amnesia with respect to this particular national poll, without any kind of substantive clue in their video titles as to why this particular national poll matters more than the rest. Missing is the important point TSV reminds people is that there are a number of early voting states where people already voted, so he doesn't think they're going to show up as for one or another candidate in the polls. TSV then went back to finding more Allan Lichtman videos including him saying he's not changing his prediction for the election, reminding (apparently) Andrew Cuomo's brother about keeping track of the fundamental forces that influence elections, and that's in terms of governance and not campaigning. TSV also took more action, including writing postcards to swing states as encouraged by an older relative, and making donations to a couple of Voter Rights' Groups with legal boots on the ground to challenge the anti-cert practices among others that TSV heard Mr. Lichtman cite as red flags in lieu of a video that Mr. Lichtman himself posted actually just a week ago about the 2000 election. In that video, he reminded his audience about how his predictions for Gore were actually right, but it's the ballot-handling that took place that failed to reflect how people actually voted. That's why TSV wanted to help the VRGs just a little more than the committees, but he still wants to do one more round of donations for the committees as well. In the meantime while he's doing what he thinks is an appropriate amount of civilian duty for himself, he's also watching mystery videos about intruiging but -non-political- topics as a way of avoiding the hysteria as per Insurgent. There very well could be a national poll later in the week from another outlet that would show Harris above -trump- by 5 points or so, and then Insurgent will celebrate. Right now they're nail-biting, and TSV wonders if they should be called NBN, the Nail Biting Network. As per post-election plans TSV believes NBN has, he thinks they're using this hyper-presentism to distract from possibly planning to throw either Harris or the conscientious conservatives, or both, under the bus for any number of reasons. TSV has it out against the AIG's who want Israel to stop being a country, as well as the centrist Donkeys for their betrayal of Biden. TSV's making his own post-trump plans accordingly to keep pursuing Principle as God intended for all human beings.

Tropical Soulvangelical's in the process of reassessing this whole doomsday trope where the election is concerned, as per also the past couple base shares. He's -not- taking back his -own- finding that We're All Doomed in X days and weeks or so, but that's now for emerging reasons he wants to find time to try to explain. Firstly, the only thing you need to know about doomsday in general is the basics laid down in Revelations, that no one will know the exact day or time, and that it'll come like a thief in the night. Secondly is the importance of mental health and how a few hours ago TSV was watching videos about Election Year Anxiety, and right now fewer videos about the election itself. He wishes that the videos he saw were made in the recent cycle, and not 1 to 3 years ago. But among other things they suggest pulling back a bit, and here's where he thinks there are -trump lite- telemarketers in the Donkey's campaigns. He figures that the campaigns will in fact make an -attack- on the mental health messaging and come up with red herring type arguments as to apparently why you -shouldn't- obey your own instincts during this election, which of course are just as wrong on their face as the things -trump- himself is saying. TSV has already cast his early vote, and he's made another donation for Kamala at the same time, and his remaining donations he plans to do are judicious and healthfully few in number in the remaining days, so all those texting him asking for money should really just lay off and get off his case. The ones he particularly says this to are ones that end their texts with "don't regret not doing more." He actually regrets not doing -less- in 2004, which was the last doomsday election, and that's Bush-Kerry, and that's an election whose historical videos he watched -never- mentioned the doomsday trope that was used then. This is evidence of conventional westernized amnesia, and he suspects that all those people telling -him- we're all doomed and about existentialism will -never- go back to that messaging after the election is over, and here's why he suspects that. Now-me-too-male Al Franken during the 2004 cycle TSV remembers saying, if Bush wins this one we'll just be a banana republic. And then Bush -did- win that one, but Al Franken did -not- say, okay now we're a banana republic, and neither did anyone else after that race ever again, and instead Al Franken sighed and said, okay people, keep fighting. TSV believes something similar will happen here, no matter how the election turns out, and it's just as two-faced as you can get. The mental health videos warned about the messaging of fear in campaign ads, and those are very replete TSV has seen this year as well. But among other things TSV wants to do independently of the Donkey's telemarketers using emotional manipulation, he still wants to go after Schumer and Schiff and Stabenow for having thrown Biden under the bus, having the gall to pretend to support him in an apparent "tribute," and then helping send out texts in this cycle like nothing ever happened back in July the way TSV distinctly remembers happening.

Tropical Soulvangelical wants to follow up on what he said about Eric Adams, because it was just within the first two hours or so of Eric Adams getting indicted that TSV said he doesn't think Adams should resign. TSV's revised that point of view to say that he's more open to a resignation of Adams -per se-, partly because he had no idea just how much media coverage Eric Adams getting indicted would get, but TSV -will not- call for a resignation. TSV knows full well that calling for a resignation of Adams is one-and-the-same as throwing in the towel on issues of principle for the city. For example, TSV observes that pretty much the day after Eric Adams got indicted, the city council proposed legalizing jaywalking, which is just nothing short of flabbergasting, and which confirms for TSV the kind of anything-goes politics that the city council really wants to do but they don't yet have a rubber stamp at Gracie Mansion. Other than sending the message that the city council doesn't think either principle or proper behavior matter, TSV knows full well legalizing jaywalking will just lead to all sorts of on-street conflicts at the intersection. TSV's going to get all these people who seem to think that legalized jaywalking means they can climb on the hoods of people's cars at the intersection just because they think they could (they -can't-), or push other people out of the way at the crosswalk, or bully those people who -by principle- proceed as if jaywalking were still illegal and actually look both ways before they cross the street and observe traffic signals accordingly. If someone doing so gets struck by a car because jaywalking is legalized, that person should have ample grounds to sue over jaywalking being legalized. Overall, TSV's observing that the jaywalking example shows there being this legalization fever sweeping the city council, because now you can see what they -really- wanted to do to the city, but they felt like Eric Adams was holding them back, and they're just waiting for the nearest opportunity to get their way regardless of how -all- city residents feel, and not just those who are pro-jaywalking. Oh, and by the way, TSV still believes we're heading for a dictatorship despite no-one talking about it, pretending that talking about economics will automatically -make- people forget that dictatorship is eminent in a month's time.

Tropical Soulvangelical skimmed through the Wikipedia article about Allan Lichtman with great interest, but frankly finds absolutely no reassurance in Mr. Lichtman's prediction of a Harris win. This is because despite that Keys To The White House set of 13 true-or-false questions, TSV finds it just sets up a very fatal overconfidence and wishful thinking situation. He's going to look back to see what Mr. Lichtman said about 2004, Bush-Kerry, because that's the election that this year's election reminds him of, mainly because of the doomsday trope that leads TSV to believe that -trump- may very well win by a landslide -but- TSV doesn't believe that means the automatic end of democracy no matter what -trump- tries to do. In order for that to happen, TSV believes that all democratic activists would need to be jumping off bridges the Wednesday after, and you don't need to be Allan Lichtman to tell you that that's just not realistic. You just need life experience with TSV has -a little more of- than he did 20 years ago. That's partly because if this race is close, -trump- won't have a mandate to kill democracy, and if the race is supposedly more about the economy than about democracy, -trump's- mandate would be about economics rather than democracy. That said, TSV only partially agrees with Hillary Clinton and Michael Cohen that -trump- would at least -try- to do a lot of damage, but TSV looks back to -trump's- attempt to repeal Funny Named Care. Sure it was because of John McCain that that didn't happen, but TSV observes that -trump- never tried to as actively repeal Funny Named Care during the remainder of his term. So begins TSV's skepticism about the doomsday trope though he can never fully rule it out. It's going to concern him that on those Insurgent 'radio' segments he hears about the doomsday trope that there's going to be a whole variety of possibly logical fallacy type arguments, including red herring, that are going to be made about how supposedly doomsday is inevitable if the wrong side of the coin faces up when tossed and landing to the ground. By contrast, TSV would greatly follow any critique Michael Cohen might make of KTTWH in what TSV expects to be Mr. Cohen's case as to why KTTWH cannot possibly predict the election with accuracy this time around, because Mr. Cohen knows -trump- far better than Mr. Lichtman does, and how -trump- himself is not one of the 13 keys. Maybe there needs to be a 14th -trump- key? But one last thing that TSV found great interest in is Mr. Lichtman's strong disagreement with the Centrist Donkeys' decision to pressure Biden out of the race, partly because TSV and Mr. Lichtman appear in agreement that the Centrist Donkeys did in fact -pressure- Biden out of the race. But TSV wants the Democratic Coalition to make plans for a New Resistance because, again, despite Mr. Lichtman's predictions, TSV points to how a close race tends to favor a Not-Donkey candidate and not a Donkey one, and hence TSV sees no realistic path to victory for Harris. He'd like to be wrong that Mr. Lichtman would be right, but he wishes closeness of race, too, were one of the KTTWH's.

Tropical Soulvanglical doesn't think Eric Adams should resign out of being indicted, but TSV feels realistic enough to believe that Mr. Adams should not run for a second term. He's already unpopular with 28% of the vote, and the indictments only serve to counter Mr. Adams's pro-principle arguments, but here's the thing. It's Mr. Adams himself -standing- for principle that TSV sees at stake, not the concept of principle itself. But that hasn't stopped what TSV observes as the highly -unprincipled- extreme Squad as getting political capital out of saying he should resign immediately. They appear to wish to not only win but -dominate- the politics of Gracie Mansion in terms of the culture of personal corruption in the city to the opposing viewpoints of those value voter city residents who believe, like TSV, that National Principle taking the form of Municipal Principle has to be top priority, even above economic interests. TSV doesn't believe -for a second- that a Squad Mayor of New York City would even -consider- reaching out to pro-principle value voters, because from the point of view of a Squad Mayor, if one point of view is false, namely Eric Adams himself, then the other one somehow -must- be true, and that's the apparent point of view that the concept of principle doesn't matter either philosphically or culturally, and are too likely to use the office of Mayor to browbeat the residents accordingly instead of helping solve their problems.

Tropical Soulvangelical's taking a momentary break from what he sees as a generally hopeless election to talk about the racketeering and sex slavery, etc., that Diddy's been accused of. He wants to caution young singles in their 20s and 30s wanting to go on dating adventures in this day and age about which persons and groups they hook up with online, particularly at -adult- dating sites. So it's the accusations against Diddy and what the big guy upstairs personally -convicted- Jeffrey Epstein of doing when the latter killed himself. So in the end, Epstein -did- face accountability far greater than he did on Earth, because it'll last for all eternity for him. So while TSV allows me the Happy Bachelor to still socialize with my Happy Bachelor Girlfriends, he's choosing a more spiritually aware celibacy for himself and has decided not to date, because we live in too corrupt a society for that dating practice not to be tantamount to looking the other way. Dating, he now believes, and since the failures of humanity to really take good hard lessons out of the pandemic, is aiding and abetting immorality at large. He hasn't ruled out finding the right person namely by chance with whom "it just happened," but he knows that's still within the boundaries of right-and-wrong, and dating by contrast is -not- within those boundaries anymore. So his cautioning to young people is to watch out for what he calls those Nubile Nickies on the adult sites promising a willing partner for anyone who goes to a Nubile Nicky event, plying, naturally, Nicky's Nubiles, because once you get there, you see the potential partners as not appearing of-age or whose body language suggests going through the motions because it's all under hidden duress. TSV has next to no confidence that said dating sites would ever effectively police themselves of these Nubile Nicky types, and the accusations that Diddy's accused of essentially point to him being a Nubile Nicky type, particularly him drugging his victims, getting them to have sex and catching it all on camera as a form of blackmail. TSV's pretty sure most adventurous singles in their 20s and 30s are reacting with outright -surprise- that any hip or happening party animal type they may find fun with could -ever- be accused of such heinous acts. TSV, on the other hand, is as far from surprised as anyone can get. What he's heard fits the profile of a Nubile Nicky, a -pimp- of sorts rather, like a hand in glove. Ever since he's seen humanity morally failing in the post-pandemic world, he's always suspected there being numerous Nubile Nicky types out there, so the only thing he -is- surprised about is having one being confirmed for him. TSV never thought he could ever be that spot-on. So he wants adventurous young singles to watch out for their own personal safety and each other's while they're at it, but also to think about how their adventure-seeking is both blinding them to the immoralities of the party organizers promising a good time and looking the other way from the suffering of their victims. Most of all is the attention they give said organizers to make the latter feel like, I Can Do Anything I Want, which is -the- immorality of the 2010s, and which there was that divine punishment to all humankind in the form of the pandemic, and how we cheated ourselves out of an opportunity to come clean, repent and hold ourselves accountable. That's what TSV sees the Diddy case being all about, and -another- suspicion he has is -trump- possibly in raising funds to pay his legal fees and campaign financing hawking tee shirts reading Diddy Did Nothing Wrong.

Tropical Soulvanglical is likely going to be repeating himself here until, and maybe after Election Day, but he's becoming skeptical with respect to this being a so-called Doomsday Election, like the way Bush-Kerry was, except that Bush-Kerry turned out not to be doomsday, mainly because Bush lost the privatize-Social-Security election. And now TSV's hearing people who seem to want his alliance saying something to the effect of, well yes we said past elections were doomsday elections, but this time we mean it. So, TSV wonders, are you saying you -didn't- mean it during Bush-Kerry, and if so, what substantive assurance can you give him that this actually -is- a doomsday election to the point where a -trump- victory means the end of everything? Are we just going to just throw in the towel and wave the white flag? Is everyone who wants Kamala to win and fails to get her to do so just going to cower and let -trump- do stuff because of whatever possible spin that says -trump- got political capital from his possibly upcoming victory? And if not, does that mean that the undecided voters feel like they're seeing through all the talk about a doomsday election and just seeing it as rhetoric? And if so, why isn't TSV allowed to feel the same way? Also, if it's truly a doomsday election, why doesn't TSV see Kamala making that actual pitch to undecided voters rather than -just- focus on economics and immigration where undecided voters are concerned? Is it because of that whole Ben Franklin thing about focusing on someone's self-interest? TSV wonders why anyone should think of what Ben Franklin said there as gospel as if we can't have a discussion about that now. Isn't maintaining a democracy in -everyone's- best interest? If the wrong person wins, will all those undecided voters continue to whistle past the graveyard and deny themselves as living in a dictatorship? So it's either one or two things for TSV. Either this -is- a doomsday election and somehow the undecided voters are just being too pigheaded and stubborn, or the undecided voters are right in believing that it's -not- a doomsday election and TSV's being sold a bill of goods by those who are supposed to be his allies and this is just Bush-Kerry all over again. These are the unanswered questions TSV has, along with whether or not Kamala's doing enough interviews to get analysts to stop claiming that no-one knows who she is, and TSV wants Insurgent to get him satisfactory answers to him on a silver platter rather than -just- talk about how terrible Chris Robinson is, or -trump- or JD Vance or Laura Loomer, or how terrible it is what Springfield Ohio is going through. None of that matters to TSV because if we go into late October with it -still- being 49-49 in all swing states, a Kamala win will almost certainly get challenged at the Supreme Court because Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito are personally corrupt for accepting bribes for favorable opinions. Even though Mark Elias sounding the alarm on the anti-certification movement was effectively his job interview as part of Kamala's election legal team, TSV doesn't see that team as having any chance in hell against a corrupt move-the-goalposts court system. That's why he wants to see the undecideds finally decide in Kamala's favor so he can personally present a slam-dunk case in front of the Supreme Court that they cannot deny or kabuki dance their way out of. Stay tuned.

So here's Tropical Soulvangical's general take on the election thus far. He thinks it's a good thing for Kamala to have done that interview with 6abc taking place in Jonestown PA within -trump- country, because that goes along the lines of doing more interviews so as to introduce yourself to people. He thinks it's kind of peculiar that criticisms of her not doing more interviews come from the -trump- campaign itself, because to him it sounds like a -constructive- criticism. He's more used to a criticism to the effect of Kamala somehow being a 'Marxist,' which burned down at the gate at the debate. He doesn't get another criticism from an immigrant journalist that she should have done more, preferably in the debate, about going after that whole dogs-n-cats thing, because he's not sure Kamala was any more aware than TSV itself of what dogs-n-cats-gate would turn into just in -trump's- first five or so words of, they're eating the dogs and cats, because just on the face of it, it made sense to TSV that Kamala would properly exercise the oh-come-on eyeroll choreography at just those five words. He did see her criticize the effects that that conspiracy theory had on Springfield, Ohio, with respect to all the lockdowns at schools and town halls when she did that journalist group interview. He did see mention on Morning Whoa on Insurgent about there being a prominent Creole restaurant in that town that apparently gets a lot of patronage, and not just from the Haitian immigrant community. He's also wondering whether in or near the town there's a Haitian community radio station, possibly on AM, and which also exemplifies the importance of AM, because he's not sure if such a station would necessarily work on FM. For one thing, FM has -way- too many stations on the dial, and they're all format-changing/singles-oriented/top-40/really cutthroat. Perhaps there are high school and college stations for Springfield on FM, but a Haitian community station TSV thinks would go far deeper than the superficiality of the FM sound would allow for. You really don't need crystal clear sound on discussions on that station, TSV doesn't think, nor crystal clear on the culturally enriching music that gets played on that station, namely from artists that are big in Haiti but maybe not as well known in the US. You're not going to get that from your smartphone. There's a lot about our Caribbean neighbors TSV doesn't think we know a whole lot about, because we tend to only see them from a tourist destination point of view. TSV hopes that prominent presenters from said station would do an interview on Insurgent to talk about both how dogs-n-cats-gate is making them worried, and a little bit more on the history of Haitian immigrants in the town, to turn otherwise negative press into a positive in a sense. TSV's further suggestions would be for Kamala to find other 6abc type local stations both in Michigan and Wisconsin to do interviews on, and he wants to contact 6abc to thank them for the interview and to do a followup with undecideds with whatever more -specific- questions they may have. He doesn't think it does much good for undecideds to say, well I don't know anything about Kamala, when they also don't want to specify what else they want to know, particularly when this is supposed to be a doomsday election, and you shouldn't be fidgeting over the question of sausage or pepperoni when your plane's going down.

OK people so by now you've seen the debate, except kind of for Tropical Soulvangelical who admits he kind of wussed out and just looked at the Cliff Notes summary of the debate footage. That's partly because most outlets that aren't Insurgent or the late show hosts have truly wanted for Kamala to have a "Biden" style fail at the debate, even though his understanding of Kamala told him that she was going to have -trump- for breakfast (though it was 9pm in the evening, a bit late for breakfast), and he saw her do so. Up to this point, said outlets kept on insisting that no-one knows who she is, and that she needs to define herself before -trump- defines her -for- her. The problem is, TSV truly believes said outlets, and he wants to call out three in particular, will -still- insist that nobody knows who she is despite apparently a very big set of ratings for the debate. TSV only saw a thumbnail of one video of swing voters' responses to the debate, but he's pretty sure at least one of those is going to be a plant who will say, well I still don't know anything about her! She didn't say anything about what she wants to do for the country! I have two kids in college about to try to find their first home once they graduate and Kamala hasn't explained how her economic plans will help them! And then said outlets, TSV expects, will mainline the plants without even looking at the possibility of their being plants, and then insist, well, the swing voters made clear that Kamala didn't say anything about what she wants do for the country. We heard from one swing voter who has two kids in college about to try to find their first home once they graduate express frustration over Kamala not explaining to them how her economic plans will help them. TSV firmly expects there to be plants posing as swing voters in the swing voter panels that said outlets will make no attempt to screen, and whom said outlets will quote said plant swing voters verbatim, and that said outlets will attempt to prevent the polls from meaningfully changing after the debate, and then point to the unchanged polls and say, Kamala failed to move the needle, and hence -trump- won the debate. Sure TSV saw a thumbnail/title from CNN saying "devastating" very likely meaning for -trump- but this is just the first six hours. How about the next 18 hours after that? What if even those outlets, TSV wonders, who gave the debate victory to Kamala will try to turn around and give it back to -trump- as above? So here are those three outlets that TSV wants to go after specifically, though he's not going to limit to those three: The New York Times, the Associated Press, National Public Radio. It's going to be these three outlets TSV firmly expects to spin the debate toward -trump- with their very oh so polite intellectualism, even though he claims that people in Illinois are eating dogs and cats, and everyone who tuned in heard him say that, and that was included in TSV's Cliff Notes. TSV would actually be -amazed- if any of the three outlets would even mention the dogs and cats bit. So in post-debate, TSV would be very interested in his part for the election to join with pro-principle petitioning groups to go after the outlets to make sure they don't spin towards margin-of-error polls that they insist don't move the needle. Oh, by the way, since NPR's been waging a personal war against Biden, particularly in their insistence that Russia was not going to invade Ukraine two weeks before Russia did so, TSV refers to them as National Putin Radio. So unless TSV finds those principled groups that'll hold the outlets' feet to the fire, we're all doomed, like he's been saying the past week.

Tropical Soulvangelical still thinks we're doomed ahead of the debate, but he's getting used to the idea that it's pretty much over for the country, though that's -if- predictions come out about Project 25 and polls still don't move the needle on the so-called blue wall. He doesn't want to dwell too much on the Dana Bash interview and a discussion about 1872, but here's the thing. Even though you can argue the similarities between 1872 and 2020/2021, TSV wanted there to be a followup on comparing 1876 and 2024. Did anyone propose a Project 1876 that would have made America into a dictatorship then, and if so, did America become a dictatorship, and if so, did America stay a dictatorship in near perpetuity to the modern day, and if so, why didn't anyone say during the Obama election that we were too doomed for there to be Change We Can Believe In? He hears comparisons between Hungary and America, as well as Venezuela and America, in terms of people who manage to stay in power, but to be fair, is America the same or all that similar to Hungary or Venezuela? Or for that matter, are Hungary and Venezuela more the same than they are different to -each other-? One thing TSV seems to remember is that Hungary and Venezuela were satellite states for the Soviet Union during the Cold War, so once the Cold War was over, countries such as Hungary and Venezuela had very delicate democratic institutions at best compared to America's more robust institutions. Understandably that's only -more- robust, and not totally ironclad by any means. But the last thing TSV wants to hear is that the election is our last best hope for democracy forever, and that once that hope fails, because he thinks it -will-, that someone says okay let's go to Plan B, and defeat Project 25 like we defeated the privatization of Social Security in 2005, because that would be moving the goal posts like we did in 2005. That would be Bush-Kerry all over again, and TSV will be absolutely infuriated. It's certainly possible that the politicians would be so inept and incompetent in the worst case scenario that they might not be able to get Project 25 off the ground and those figures and citizens that are against it would then be successful in killing Project 25 once and for all. Another thing TSV also notices as not mentioned is what happens if -trump- doesn't get the Congress he wants, and there's a shift on at least one side of the other party taking back the House? That party he's pretty sure would certainly kill Project 25 in its majority and as for the Senate in being in -trump's- corner after the election, would there be an effort to stop and stem Project 25 at the Senate level through possibly a walkout or some other public figure protest? It's hard for TSV to imagine someone as fatalistic as Chuck Schumer -ever- effectively leading such a protest, so it's going to have to come down to someone else, almost certainly since Schumer also led the anti-Biden coalition, so how's -that- democratic? There's a lot more unanswered questions such as these to unpack for TSV, but he goes into the debate with lowered expectations that most outlets other than Insurgent would cover the aftermath of the debate with any shred of integrity whatsoever. He fully expects most outlets to try to not talk about -trump's- failings during the debate or Kamala making her targets. He doesn't think they'll -ever- report a Kamala victory in the debate, and instead he expects them to just say, there was some kind of debate and now let's talk about the murder of the day. They might actually turn to footage of a high speed chase collision as a distraction like with the Attack Dog Network, and only Insurgent and the late show hosts will call them out on it, and polls for the blue wall will -still- be within the margin of error, because the debate would have failed to move the needle, like TSV hearing John Fetterman essentially predict, and that's because the outlets want to keep that needle there in their -protrump- personal corruption, and that's how TSV doesn't see any kind of Kamala victory whatsoever no matter what happens after the debate. So that's how it's over for the country, and how TSV still hates elections no matter how democratic or un- they are.

So here's Tropical Soulvangelical's update from our post we made the other day. In short, we're all still doomed. TSV envisions that about every couple days or so till the election, his comments will still be the same: we're all doomed, we're all doomed, we're all doomed. That's because he doesn't expect anything to change between now and then that the newsradio he listens to first thing in the morning would be -forced- to admit what -trump's- done wrong in the election cycle so far. TSV hasn't heard anything about the desecration of Arlington National Cemetery, or the off-the-wall and offensive things he's said at both rallies and interviews. He had to find that out from Insurgent whom TSV hasn't heard has any presence on actual radio waves whatsoever. He's thinking that maybe Insurgent thinks itself too yuppie to not go highbrow like with Sirius XM or the Internet, because he's hoping that Insurgent's online description says, oh by the way, our programming is also syndicated on these radio stations AM/FM now that TSV's got FM tuned into better. But while he's there he sees a video title saying "You're Being Manipulated!!!" when Insurgent itself does not provide a wider enough antidote that he thinks they could. TSV still doesn't understand how a majority of Americans had -ever- heard of Project 25, let alone find out enough about it to poll against it, and please don't tell TSV something to the effect, oh they just went to the Internet. You can't say that, because Ordinary Joe Six Pack will never go to the Internet except for porn, and maybe also QAnon, and almost certainly never look at Insurgent in a million years, because that's only for political junkies or something. For Insurgent to be yelling at TSV with respect to Manipulated and Desecration can't amount to an election strategy of sorts, because that's just preaching to the choir, and TSV is only one potential voter. You've got possibly 50 million Joe Six Pack swing voters in swing states waiting, apparently, to have Kamala introduce herself to them. He doesn't understand the notion that the upcoming debate is her opportunity to do so when he also hears that undecided voters are the least likely people to watch debates, because again that's probably for political junkies like Insurgent apparently is. He doesn't see either Insurgent or Kamala doing anything to get the radio to acknowledge that she is or has introduced herself. He doesn't want his donation dollars to -only- go to rallies and speeches. He's aware that donation dollars go to door-to-door efforts, and he's wondering why anyone, including the radio, thinks that's -not- a way for Kamala to introduce herself. Also, he understands that the Donkey Convention got more TV ratings than the Elephant Convention did, so isn't -that- not Kamala introducing herself? And what's the radio's proof that neither effort counts as a national introduction? Or that interview on CNN? There's a lot more for TSV to unpack, but this is the reason why he doesn't understand elections. TSV uses the radio as a personal alarm system, and every other means of gathering info as following up on what he hears where he deems necessary. He's not saying everyone else has to do that, but he doesn't want anyone to tell him, oh well that's because you're -intelligent-, because, again, him as one person being intelligent isn't going to magically make Kamala win no matter how much he donates to her campaign. The campaign's already got 500 mil in the back compared to -trump's- 150, and she -still- polls within the margin of error in swing states. TSV's thinking that the Joe Six Pack swing voters in those swing states are hearing the radio tell them, Kamala still has to introduce herself, and then the swing voters say, oh well Kamala still has to introduce herself so therefore I don't know anything about her, so maybe I'll vote for -trump- instead. What if that person -also- tuned into the convention and also got mailings and door-to-door visits? TSV wonders how much good that does once that person goes back to the radio and still believes, Kamala hasn't introduced herself when she already did so for that one person at least. TSV believes that even now is early September, it'll be late October and he'll -still- hear, it's late October, and Kamala still hasn't introduced herself. That's another way in which he's reminded of Bush v Kerry 2004, hence he thinks we're doomed.

So here's Tropical Soulvangelical's take on the election thus far, and generally speaking he thinks we're pretty much screwed. As far as he's concerned Kamala should be polling ahead -outside- the margin of error in those so-called "blue wall" states at this point. He remembers when Biden was polling -behind- and -inside- the margin of error, and TSV's take was that it was only within the margin of error, and even now he thinks the Anti-Biden Centrist Donkeys who essentially stabbed him in the back did so by misinterpreting the polls and probably never themselves believed that Biden never had a chance. He also doesn't want to hear things such as, well, Obama was polling this at this point or Clinton was polling that at this point, because he doesn't think you can go back to the past on this one, and therefore it's just -wrong-. Obama and Clinton never had to deal with Project 25 which TSV isn't seeing Insurgent as analyzing as being based on the laws of North Korea like he thinks they should. He, too, hasn't read those 900 pages, but he's pretty sure page 527 talks about special haircuts for all males in the population like it is in North Korea or something. TSV still likes both Kamala and Tim Walz a lot, but he's thinking about a tabloid whose current headline reads something to the effect of, "Kam't Explain It, not even Kamala's supporters can say what she stands for." Why on Earth isn't that ringing alarm bells for people, TSV wonders. He then goes on Insurgent and they seemed to not even notice that there's this headline. Their video list is on the sunny-side up, Kamala ahead, Trump behind, joyful enthusiasm biased side of things. TSV really doesn't entirely believe that the concept of joyful enthusiasm is really all that helpful to -any- election campaign, because in -his- personal experience, the most severe and major problems he's ever had in life he's solved using grim determination and a reality check that says that we basically live in a terrible world. TSV doesn't want to jinx Kamala like he jinxed John Kerry in 2004. He's looking back now and thinks that was pretty much -his- fault. The buck stops with TSV, and no-one else. He doesn't want to jinx Kamala, but it's his duty and obligation as a patriotic American to call a spade a spade, and how the concept of joyful enthusiasm -is itself- a form of complacency. The only time when TSV experiences joyful enthusiasm is when he's going to a drum circle, or jamming along with a concert, or participating in a rock-n-roll discussion group online, or listening to a rock bio or documentary while he's having pizza or BSK or a cheesesteak or some other really bad food along with some ice cream. That to him is joyful enthusiasm, but once he gets back in his car again these days after all that is over, he knows it's generally terrible, particularly with respect to how we as a society never really learned the lessons of the pandemic or ever admitted guilt and endured penance as a result. We basically used the vaccine as a cheap out, and now he sees our paying that price now this year. It's bucket listing the basics now, and if Kamala does somehow manage to win, TSV's thinking that'll just consummate our personal corruption even more, because then we'll have a Kamala victory to hide our shortcomings behind so that we never attack those sins head-on. So never mind the so-called joyful enthusiasm, because TSV's convinced we're all doomed.

We're going to try to be brief on this one, but both me the Happy Bachelor and Tropical Soulvangelical announce our endorsement for Kamala Harris to be our next President. There's a lot to elaborate on and to unpack, but we do acknowledge this is a late endorsement, also with it being just after the first night of the convention. TSV has no idea what happened tonight, but he's sure he'll find out the next morning on newsradio, what with what he has seen as the anti-Biden media wishing and practically -pleading- for a repeat of 1968, the jerks. But TSV made his choice after seeing his tropically conservative followeds including George Latimer, Tom Suozzi and Eric Adams all make their endorsements accordingly. We now being in tropical soul is also TSV's way of consummating his tropical conservatism as per our criticisms of forces such as the squad and anti-Israel demonstrators, among others (and yes, TSV sees that most of the squad also endorsed the Madame Vice President). As such TSV sees our endorsement as confirming our tropically conservative nevertrumpism, and TSV has seen true conservatives such as David French and Judge Doug Luttig make their apparent endorsements, along with the Mayor of Mesa, Arizona. TSV listened on the insurgent network about how David French in that one publication, and TSV can't remember offhand if it was the New York Times or the Wall Street Journal, mention that he loathes things like sex abuse, porn and adultery, and he sees -trump- as normalizing those things. TSV didn't hear from the same insurgent segment as to whether this is getting at a more general point about right-and-wrong, but he hopes that this is what this comes down to, as per TSV's commitment to pursuing the instituting of National Principle. It's possible TSV will get back to those texts asking, will you endorse Kamala Harris!!?? and then text Y, and mention the need for National Principle in pursuit of the moral and spiritual value of principle itself. Stay tuned.

Tropical Soulvangelical listened to Tim Walz's speech at the rally in Philadelphia hours after Kamala Harris chose him as her running mate. Maybe TSV's got his standards up too high because of all the hype regarding who will be Kamala's running mate? But all he heard was the checking off on almost exclusively pragmatic checkboxes, and as Kamala's campaign emerges, TSV sees this as reflecting the campaign as a whole, to pretty much -only- go pragmatic and not to talk to the more spiritual and spiritually existential issues of right and wrong and the inherent corruption of society as a whole. That he finds is a concern, not because he doesn't think Kamala can't win without it, but partly because she -can- and -will- win without it, and hence leave the impression that certain unasked and unanswered questions will never be important enough to address. He didn't hear anything from Tim Walz as to what a Harris-Walz team will do to restore America back to the righteous path that it veered from starting in 2013 with Ed Snowden, and which eventually led to -trumpism- and insurrectionism, including the idea of, "I can do anything I want" or "I can shoot someone on Fifth Avenue." At no point in Walz's speech did TSV hear anything to the effect of when Biden said, "When you get knocked down, you get back up." TSV believes it's a mistake for any campaign to go into a victory without answering some unanswered questions, because like how he saw with Obama and Ed Snowden, that spells disaster. TSV saw as Ed Snowden -alone- as driving Obama's administration into a complete tailspin to the point where TSV doesn't think Obama still had the confidence of Donkeys or progressives or Joe Six Pack at the end of his Presidency, and at what point in 2008 did Obama have to answer any debate questions about Ed Snowden? Did anyone ask, let's say some guy named Ed Snowden comes out of the blue and claims that the appearance of government secrecy alone means you don't care about progressive values. What would you do then? TSV sees absolutely no discussion about statesmanship and how you would like your tensure to viewed in history in the years and decades and centuries to come. TSV's getting tired of politicians implying they don't have to worry about how history will view them, because they're going to be dead by then, so somehow that means that the question doesn't matter. What TSV sees as truly defining statesmanship in the modern era is about going beyond those promises you made in the election and into reassuring the populace on basic right and wrong. It's just not enough for TSV for Harris/Walz to beat Trump/Vance in the election. You also need to beat your own personal tendency not to answer the big questions. It's not enough to solve people's problems either. At the end of Tim Walz's speech tonight, TSV was reminded of what Derek Jeter said on a car commercial that he thinks should apply to the leadership standard that TSV believes was lost shortly after JFK got shot. Jeter said that if you want to be the best, being good enough is just not good enough.

So here's a followup to a followup to a followup, etc., Tropical Soulvangelical wants to make about the Kamala campaign, and he wants to be able to repeat certain points here, and probably not make any real central points. He really likes Kamala a lot and wants to donate to her campaign when he gets a chance. He's thinking that the honeymoon will have been over by the time he does so, because, again, society makes it so he never gets anything done "on time." But he still sees himself in the independent camp in some respects in his tropical conservatism. He absolutely -has not- joined "Kamalot" because he thinks that's disturbing, both with respect to Obama and JFK. He also feels it unlikely he'll "bro" with Kamala like he did with Biden and Warren, partly because of the disturbance of Kamalot and how he thinks Kamala is unlikely to placate the "cease fire" crowd. That last bit he thinks is because of his cynicism, also borne of tropical soul, that the "cease fire" crowd don't just want a cease fire. He's unconvinced that that's -not- their getting the foot in the door and then declaring Cease Israel. He saw what happened back in April and May with "activists" coming onto colleges out of nowhere, breaking into buildings, taking down flags, doing Days Of Rage, making students of a variety of cultural heritages feel uncomfortable, not to mention actually -celebrating- 10/7. TSV already listened to the video that Kamala as VP made about Israel and Gaza to point out it's not a "binary issue," and that nobody of any background should be made to feel threatened or harassed or uncomfortable. TSV strongly doubts that will mollify that half of the activism that's purist about a "one state solution," and which he perceives drove most of young people's anti-Biden feeling, even though TSV sees it as an extremist and untenable position, for either Biden or Kamala. He heard on Philadelphia radio how this is a "movement" that "worries" about Kamala, because TSV sees her making a common sense proposal which he thinks can turn off enough young people who seem to want extremism. He already got me The Happy Bachelor to channel his misgivings about so-called "youth power," because he's not convinced that it's not systematic ageism or a -trump- level threat to democracy. He understands about attracting young voters from a marketing perspective, but he wants there to be an inclusion of all age groups, and not just 18-35. There are far more people, he thinks, 36 and older who want to help Kamala and help stop -trump- who don't want to end up digging their parental graves allowing young people to protest, for example, bedtime and cleaning up their rooms. So the one thing he thinks would help Kamala with the independent not-Kamalot crowd is a sitdown about basic right-and-wrong and whether her relationship to the concept of principle got her originally interested in the legal profession before she turned to public service. This would help him help her help him, as well as antitrump voters all over the spectrum mostly worried about the future of basic right-and-wrong in the national culture. Stay tuned.

So amidst our announcement of having reached the spiritually righteous state of Tropical Soul, Tropical Soulvangelical also felt like he needed to follow up on our base share regarding The Go Of Joe and The Coming Of Kamala, though he doesn't really have any one central point to make. So thankfully, TSV's listening of newsradio thus far hasn't indicated the same trope against Kamala, and instead for the Donkeys and progressive activists it's been the opposite. Looks as though those groups have turned over a new leaf, what with recommitted delegates and endorsements and fundraising dollars coming out of their ears. 100 million in 24 hours was something that -really- got TSV doing double takes. He remembers LOD's concern a month ago that a replacement for Joe Go would have serious trouble raising money, having looked at the situation regarding Hubert Humphreys in light of both Lyndon Johnson declining another run and the tragic shooting of RFK. Two importance differences between then and now, though. Firstly, you didn't have the Internet in 1968 to raise money on. Secondly, there's a clearly decisive unity around Kamala that Humphreys did -not- enjoy. TSV's seeing -absolutely no-one- pulling a Dump The Hump on Kamala, not even the Israel haters thus far, and that reminds him of a point regarding the squad. When he saw all those of what he -still- considers DINOs caving in on Joe left and right, his congresswoman -never- did so, and he didn't hear that the squad ever did so either. He came across a video on Insurgent, and he's seen many more since the changing of the guard, in which a progressive caucus co-chair and apparent squad person Pramila Jayapal confirmed that the progressive caucus -also- never gave up on Joe, even though his strong stance on Israel was every reason many caucus members had to do so. So it isn't just TSV and LOD. They had something in common with the squad after all and not just everybody liking jelly donuts, but something that really did count for something and that's the value of loyalty, but also managing it not being -blind- loyalty. Everybody knew Biden's problems well, so there was never going to be -blind- loyalty except among the foolish. But there's still one problem. While TSV will give Kamala the support she needs and so deserves and he likes her a lot better than he ever liked Hillary, and frankly that bit about at least a -legal- difference between her and -trump- really helped get TSVs attention, it still wasn't enough for TSV to feel like he can 'bro' with Kamala like he did with Joe, a Joe Bro, with Bro Joe. He doesn't -need- to 'bro' with a candidate in order to help them out, but he -does- need to bro in order for him to feel loyalty and dedication, so he feels like whatever he does for Kamala will always, to him, feel and look like going through the motions, and the -trumpists- he thinks will see that. TSV wants to see that video about how Kamala's having Obama type appeal, and even though he had the same liking for Obama as he does for Kamala, he finds that the kind of lets-have-a-party type charisma he's seeing is a poor substitute for broworthiness. He's hoping that's not going to matter, and another point before he gets me the Happy Bachelor to close on this one. And that's he's thinking that the DINOs had successfully dusted their shortcomings under the rug with respect to their failing Biden, and using the Kamala candidacy to hide behind. But TSV's not fooled. He wants to go after the worst of the worst on this one, like Schumer and Schiff at least, but there's a bit of a guilt trip at this time about having to "show unity" which is another thing he really dislikes. Unity is just conformity with icing on top. But he's hoping the Blow On Joe types do individually have problems after the election so he'll be there to remind people of their disloyalty to Biden, and hence, their disloyalty to the value of principle. Schiff after having been the one to really take it to -trump- in 2016 after the election when the rest were crawling back in their shells feeling sorry for themselves should really know better. In 2024 TSV's seeing an elite in the younger Schiff's place as he vies for a Senate seat, and TSV will not be denied justice. It took us nine years to get to Tropical Soul, and we never forgot Nadir Day or any other important day in our great recovery since then, and TSV's not going to forget this one either. He's okay to close with an embitteredness amidst the great celebrations going on. That's what he did after Obama won. Typical of him, really.

Tropical Soulvangelical and I the Happy Bachelor announcer announce that this immediate culture is now in the state of Tropical Soul as of 7/17/24. More details on the right hand side, but TSV wants to reiterate that it's been a good long nine years since what the announcement calls "Nadir Day" (please read for details), but the kind of things we've been doing we'll keep on doing. That bit hasn't changed. But do see the current situation of our immediate culture as a consummation of the Tropical Soul we try to be as much about as possible. With regards to that "lifesaver" moniker that's mentioned in the announcement, we're going to try to get a pic there soon enough as of this writing so you know what that's about. But thanks to all you of you and your encouragement over the years!

Tropical Soulvangelical respects Joe Biden's decision to quit the race, but TSV texted Biden at that one available number to say he wishes he were still running. He tells Biden that Kamala seems a strong candidate, but that he may very well still be a Biden Bro at heart. TSV feels like he passed a test of principle in that he didn't cave and go, oh Joe you got to go. He took Biden's advice when he got knocked down and he got back up again, and got back up TSV did in keeping his faith to a fellow faithful until the latter made an apparently personal decision not to do the race anymore. TSV did look at a couple vids from the Insurgent Network, and though he doesn't feel as vengeful on the Donkeys as he did earlier today, he still hasn't ruled out withdrawing his support from those he still believes pressured Biden out of the race. But like he implies above, he's not sure he can 'bro' with Kamala Harris like he did with Biden. He did bro with a woman candidate before, specifically Elizabeth Warren, so it's not gender. But like those guys driving big pickups with -trump- flags flying, TSV still wishes for a candidate he can have that principle-based unwavering support for, and he disagrees with the intellectualists he saw on Insurgent that those Donkeys that bro'd for Joe were necessarily being counter-productive. That just seems too one-sided and overanalytical point of view. Again he asks the intellectualists that if they could explain everything, what is there left to believe in? Because if you manage to win a race or a contest only going fact-based and not ever believing in anything, that victory is in fact a moral defeat. You really don't feel like you won. Still, TSV wants to go back to Insurgent to see their response to -trump's- response to Biden leaving the race. TSV was pretty sure -trump- would make a jerk-ass response like something to the effect of, I -knew- Biden was a loser and a quitter! Now he's proved it! And TSV did see something to that effect on a separate thumbnail, so he's hoping Insurgent not only condemn the response, but specifically condemn it as not helpful to swing voters who are seemingly only concerned about inflation, and make it so that it drives -trump's- poll numbers down compared to Harris. That is, unless, of course the -trump- ingratiating media's going to start a HarrisWatch as to whether the Donkeys will in turn try to pressure -Harris- out of the race for being too something or another, fill in the blank here.

Both me the Happy Bachelor and Tropical Soulvangical join in condemning the violence reported at the -trump- rally. You may have noticed the absence of an observation TSV made about Arlington National Cemetery and whether Presidents who did not serve qualify. TSV asked me to withdraw that particular base share because he thought that it wasn't appropriate in light of what happened over the weekend. That said, he takes exception to the apparent media spin that the attempt on -trump's- life somehow -helped- -trump- by, among other things, raising equity stakes in DJT. This is because if -trump- does win, it's going to be the media that'll have an even harder time in the post-election era than -trump- will. After the election, the media will have to explain to the people why they gave -unfactual- backing coverage to one candidate over the other, and TSV will not allow them to stonewall or engage in denial. Because if it is true that the media's being encouraged by political operatives this year, TSV doesn't see that encouragement and assistance continuing after the election. And that's because TSV is an outsider in not seeing these things transactionally. As far as he's concerned, transactional is not factual. Hence he will refuse the Donkey Committee's insistence that he somehow make an artificial dividing line between the election season and the post-election season, and pretend that the latter can't bear to hold on the former. He'll just say NO, and he's not going to waste time explaining why or engage in idle chat accordingly. Anybody who tries to tell him to just "get over it" should really -right now- themselves get over trying to tell him that. Such a request runs counter to his obligation to get -trump- to reach out to Biden voters by promising to adhere to a list of demands TSV knows Biden would fulfill in a second term. If -trump- refuses in some way, that's the same as losing the victory that he had gained in the election season proper. TSV's been doing more studying into historical documents like the Federalist Papers, and he sees that we the people actually have a lot more rights than we've been exercising thus far. Also with respect to the Supreme Court and other political establishments, TSV remembers a refrain made by the founders that our rights come from God, and as such they -don't- come from the politicians. This he'll adhere to stubbornly no matter what arguments the political junkie culture will try to throw his way, because very likely these will be logicial fallacies such as red herring or slogan argument, because what else are they ever going to have?

Tropical Soulvangelical reminds us of isolated news items you may have missed because of the media's War On Biden, also enabled by spineless Donkey figures. First one was just hours before I the Happy Bachelor shared this base share, and that was a judge's dismissal of charges against Alec Baldwin and ruling that Mr. Baldwin can never be re-charged again. Ever since that tragedy whereby Mr. Baldwin accidentally shot a props person, TSV observed the moguls of unaccountability and personal corruption mount a you-reap-what-you-sow campaign against Mr. Baldwin on behalf of -trump- solely because Mr. Baldwin made imitations of -trump- on Saturday Night Live. How -dare- he do that! We will get our revenge! With the media spinning positive karma towards -trump's- way and away from Biden, TSV speculates that the last thing the media had ever expected would be that Mr. Baldwin would be freed from all charges, and then they'd be forced to cover the dismissal as a partial penance for their War On Biden. TSV's estimating that this is just the beginning of the Anti-Biden Media's troubles in weeks and months and years to come, and he doesn't see why he can't (occasionally at least) engage in insinuation and speculation on the media accordingly. We do need a free and independent press as was envisioned by our country's founders, neither of which TSV had been able to find since the debate. But here's the other news item TSV believes the media doesn't want to put on audio, and that's AOC introducting articles of impeachment against Clarence Thomas and Sam Alito, also co-sponsored by TSV's own congresswoman. TSV is by no means an AOC person, and he still worries what an AOC Presidency in 2028 means for the mere existence in the future of things like Israel, cops, national defense and security, and even straightedge culture. But he does applaud her take-action stance, and doing the right thing while her Donkey colleagues busy themselves with biting their nails over both should-we-or-shouldn't-we indecision over Biden and their worries about a -trump- dictatorship. TSV admires that AOC saw that going on and said, screw this, I'm taking action. And taking action she did. TSV continues his news diet amidst the War On Biden, and among other things, he's looking for good world news items on YouTube he can convert to audio for his player, so that he still tries to maintain a global perspective while the domestic media continues to go off duty.

So it's been nearly two weeks since the debate, which Tropical Soulvanglical understands is an entire news cycle, so he doesn't think there's any reason why that one newsradio segment at the top of the hour he's monitoring while he's still doing his news diet should keep on nattering about Biden unless they really want Biden to fail, and by extension, to want his -supporters- to fail, ostensibly in life itself, and that includes TSV. TSV's considering making a list of those feckless donkeys in office whom he sees selling out on Biden, and calling on them to resign from said offices, and for them to not have committee assignments or cabinet positions in the future until and unless they sincerely change their positions on Biden. TSV will say it again, and that's that Biden will always be -his- President no matter who wins in November. TSV will right now as of this writing decline to recognize a -trump- Presidency any time in the future. This is his citizenship right and obligation. At the right time in the next few days or so, TSV also wants to officially proclaim -trump- inherently guilty of any crimes he's accused of that he's not going to trial on before the election. He wants to make a separate proclamation of inherent guilt on -trump- in the hush money trial in the event that the trial's conviction gets reversed or overturned. He will also condemn such future reversal or overturning, and his condemnation effectively reverses the reversal, and overturns the overturning.