The Heir shares in the outrage at the Kyle Rittenhouse verdict.  The guy's as guilty as sin.  Though the Heir has defended Biden from both media attacks and Ed Snowden attacks, he disagrees that we must "accept" the verdict.  He actually doesn't, and in fact he believes the court trial should be submitted for independent review of some sort.  He's pretty sure such a review will find egregious flaws and discrepancies severe enough as to warrant an update to court trial guidelines, particularly in the case of accused perpetrators who engage in any mass murder they feel like, and then claim self-defense.  Sure he took the position that he's likely to accept a non-guilty verdict for Ms. Meng in the Huawei case if it ever got to trial before she left the country, but that's barring a court trial analysis comparing for example basic facts in the public domain with those that are admitted in court.  He encourages the families of the victims to sue the city, and he believes that they qualify for a restitution from the state of Wisconsin partly to offset legal fees and funereal expenses, among other expenses, plus a monetary compensation principle by which the families might decide to make donated to hate group awareness groups like SPLC.  The Heir's thinking of getting his reps to join in a resolution condemning the verdict, and donating to the SPLC on personal behalf of the Huber and Rosenbaum families (he *thinks* those are the names), even though he's never met them.  He's looking at this verdict from a pragmatic point of view of next steps, unlike the activists he was seeing on visual whom he doesn't believe are particularly helping matters.